Struggle Is Success: How a Wind Turbine Project Turned Setbacks into Strength (Overcoming challenges)
- Frank Visca
- Dec 1, 2025
- 4 min read
Overview:
A wind turbine project failed to spin, but it sparked transformation. Discover engineering lessons: Design for Manufacturing & Assembly (DFMA) and Design for Reliability (DfR), teamwork insights, and why struggle isn’t the obstacle; it’s the path to personal & professional growth in Overcoming challenges.

The Big Idea: Building a Residential Wind Solution (Vertical-Axis Wind Turbine)
We set out to build a vertical‑axis wind turbine (VAWT) that a homeowner could live with the three big requirements: quiet, compact, and aesthetically pleasing. The design combined helical aluminum outer blades with inner Savonius blades to capture energy at lower wind speeds. We used a single‑coil generator, iterated with a Pugh matrix, and chased reliability with DfR principles.
It looked great on paper. In CAD (Computer aided Design), it was elegant. In the shop, reality arrived… with a strong headwind.
When the Turbine Wouldn’t Spin: Embracing Engineering Challenges
The first time we placed the turbine in front of the fan… nothing happened. Then came the next try, still no rotation. The culprits were clear but painful:
Blade geometry and torque: Beautiful shapes don’t guarantee usable lift.
Instability and friction: A single lower bearing wasn’t enough; wobble killed momentum.
Supplier tolerances: Advertised dimensions didn’t match reality, forcing redesigns.
Generator constraints: Manual spin testing exposed our need for better fixtures and measurement.
It’s tempting to call these outcomes “failures.” But the deeper truth is this: each “no‑spin” moment pointed to the next set of problems to solve. Struggle wasn’t blocking progress, it was mapping it.
DFMA & DfR Lessons We’ll Use Forever
Design for Manufacturing & Assembly (DFMA) made us better designers because it forced us to think about how things get built, not just what gets built.
Part simplification: Fewer fasteners, smarter interfaces, and heat‑set inserts wherever threads mattered.
Material choices: Swapping from cellular PVC to aluminum blades simplified cutting, bending, and repeatability.
Assembly sequencing: Accessibility matters; coils wrapped outside the generator body were way faster than inside.
Sensible scaling: A larger generator diameter and magnet spacing reduced interference and improved voltage output.
Design for Reliability (DfR) sharpened our thinking about failure modes:
Parallel vs. series reliability: Add redundancy where it matters; design so one weak link doesn’t bring down the whole system.
Bearings and housings: A second bearing and proper housing increased stability and reduced friction instantly.
Testing realism: If wind speeds in your area are modest, design for usable torque at low RPMs, even if the numbers aren’t glamorous.
These aren’t just classroom bullets; they’re habits you develop in the shop when your beautiful theory meets a stubborn reality.
The Human Side: How This Project Made Me a Better Person
You can’t wrap 3,000 coils by hand without learning patience. You can’t walk into a shop where your prototype won’t spin without learning humility. And you can’t keep showing up after multiple dead ends unless you value grit more than comfort.
Here’s what changed in me:
Precision through patience: Coil winding, fixture setup, and tolerances taught me that speed follows accuracy.
Leadership under uncertainty: Teams don’t need perfect answers; they need calm, clarity, and next steps.
Resilience over pride: When CAD confidence meets machine‑shop reality, listening beats arguing.
Service mindset: Helping teammates, asking for help, and sharing credit. These are the real “gears” that make projects move.
I didn’t just become a better engineering student. I became a better teammate and a more grounded leader, someone who knows that struggle is the curriculum for growth.
Teamwork Wins: How We Learned to Move Together
Projects fail when people drift. Ours moved forward because we leaned in:
Clear roles (RACI mindset): Who’s Responsible, who’s Accountable, who’s Consulted, who’s Informed. Clarity beats chaos.
Tight feedback loops: Short build‑test‑adjust cycles kept us honest and nimble.
Shared ownership: From CAD to fabrication to documentation, everyone carried the project together.
When the turbine didn’t spin, the team did. That’s why we left the course stronger than when we entered it.
For Makers, Founders, Creatives: Why Struggle Is the Path

You don’t need to be in engineering to benefit from this mindset. The pattern is universal:
Idea → Design → Reality → Resistance → Iteration → Breakthrough.
The resistance is not an error, the training that builds the capacity for the breakthrough.
If you’re at the “nothing is spinning” stage, keep going. Friction is feedback. Instability is instruction. Struggle is not the obstacle; struggling is the path.
Actionable Takeaways for YOU
Design for the shop, not just the screen: If you can’t assemble it easily, you won’t improve it quickly.
Prototype torque, not just aesthetics: Measure real forces at realistic wind speeds.
Validate suppliers early: Tolerances cost time. Inspect on arrival.
Add stability first: Bearings, housings, and shaft alignment trump fancy blades.
Document learning: Your next build will thank your past notes.
Lead with calm: Teams follow steady hands, not perfect plans.
Build Through the Headwind & Overcome challenges!
If you’re mid‑project and stuck, choose one small fix and test it this week. Add a bearing. Re-cut a blade. Check a tolerance. Momentum rewards the next brave step, not the perfect plan.
And when it finally spins, when your effort catches lift, you’ll know the struggle didn’t delay success; the struggle designed it.

Comments